<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin has it right about the r-word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/</link>
	<description>Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bath oil massage beijing</title>
		<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/comment-page-1/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator>bath oil massage beijing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacparsons.com/?p=689#comment-15303</guid>
		<description>I am a regular reader of the weblog. I really admire your writings. Subscribed for your RSS feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a regular reader of the weblog. I really admire your writings. Subscribed for your RSS feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacparsons.com/?p=689#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>I guess I was basically trying to point out that there was common ground to be found between myself and someone whom I regularly disagree with.  If the r-word cause was really important to her, she probably would not have used it as a weapon to attack one of her enemies with.  To be clear, I am not a Sarah Palin fan.  Thanks for the comment Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was basically trying to point out that there was common ground to be found between myself and someone whom I regularly disagree with.  If the r-word cause was really important to her, she probably would not have used it as a weapon to attack one of her enemies with.  To be clear, I am not a Sarah Palin fan.  Thanks for the comment Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacparsons.com/?p=689#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>Palin is nothing more than an opportunist. I agree with the comments prior to mine - she is a hypocrite. No doubt about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin is nothing more than an opportunist. I agree with the comments prior to mine &#8211; she is a hypocrite. No doubt about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacparsons.com/?p=689#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>@Pam - I agree with you on most everything you have said.  It&#039;s disappointing that Palin&#039;s stance on the r-word only went as far as her political allegiances.  If it&#039;s wrong to use the word as a Democrat, then it is wrong to use it as a Republican.  It&#039;s a human issue.  I have equal distaste for those who believe that human ethical issues apply to others in a different way than they apply to themselves and their friends.  Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pam &#8211; I agree with you on most everything you have said.  It&#8217;s disappointing that Palin&#8217;s stance on the r-word only went as far as her political allegiances.  If it&#8217;s wrong to use the word as a Democrat, then it is wrong to use it as a Republican.  It&#8217;s a human issue.  I have equal distaste for those who believe that human ethical issues apply to others in a different way than they apply to themselves and their friends.  Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.zacparsons.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-has-it-right-about-the-r-word/comment-page-1/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacparsons.com/?p=689#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>Zac, I agree that the &quot;r&quot; word is in the same cateogry as the &quot;n&quot; word and its use should not be tolerated. Rahm Emanuel was wrong to use this term and he has apologized. However, Palin&#039;s outcry over Rahm&#039;s use of this word was clearly politically motivated. Palin had previously called for Rahm&#039;s removal and she eagerly pounced on his inappropriate comment to support her position. She is a hypocrite. She has continued to defend Rush Limbaugh&#039;s use of the same word to describe a group of liberals. Why is it okay with Palin for Limbaugh to refer to a group of liberal activists as a &quot;retard&quot; summit? I actually thought his use was even more offensive. So, although I agree with the message of your blog entry, I am offended at Palin&#039;s hypocrisy and clear political motivation for raising this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac, I agree that the &#8220;r&#8221; word is in the same cateogry as the &#8220;n&#8221; word and its use should not be tolerated. Rahm Emanuel was wrong to use this term and he has apologized. However, Palin&#8217;s outcry over Rahm&#8217;s use of this word was clearly politically motivated. Palin had previously called for Rahm&#8217;s removal and she eagerly pounced on his inappropriate comment to support her position. She is a hypocrite. She has continued to defend Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s use of the same word to describe a group of liberals. Why is it okay with Palin for Limbaugh to refer to a group of liberal activists as a &#8220;retard&#8221; summit? I actually thought his use was even more offensive. So, although I agree with the message of your blog entry, I am offended at Palin&#8217;s hypocrisy and clear political motivation for raising this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

